Dearest Blog: Yesterday it was off to Marquee Cinemas for First Man and Bad Times at the El Royale.
Spoiler level here will be mild, nothing you wouldn't know from the trailers.
First on my agenda: First Man.
Some stuff you know and probably a lot you didn't know about Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon.
First Man is approximately 90% Things-I-Hate-About-Awards-Type-Movies, but I still enjoyed it more than I expected to. Ryan Gosling is terrific in the lead, and his supporting cast--led by the extraordinary Claire Foy--has no trouble keeping pace. The story of Armstrong's personal life is almost as fascinating as his road to the moon, and the film gives equal screen time to each. An over-abundance of extreme close-ups is effective in depicting claustrophobic cockpit conditions, but it gets awkward when it's just folks talking science or eating dinner. Likewise, jiggly camera work and very dark shots work well in putting the viewer inside the craft--often under terrifying circumstances--but otherwise are plain annoying. The movie could have used a bit of a trim, but it never really drags or feels bloated; ultimately the amazing story outweighs any flaws in the filmmaking. Closing with full disclosure: for the duration, all I could think of was Lincoln Osiris trying to re-enter the Earth's atmosphere in an old refrigerator box, which is why they don't let me vote for the Oscars.
First Man clocks in at 141 minutes and is rated PG13 for "some thematic content involving peril, and brief strong language."
First Man is a flawed telling of a great story, well worth your movie dollar.
Of a possible nine Weasleys, First Man gets seven and a half.
Fangirl points: So many much-loved faces in this one! Shea Whigham! Corey Stoll! Ciaran Hinds! Pablo Schreiber! Brian d'Arcy James! Mister Cory Michael Smith!
Next on the docket, one of my most-anticipated titles of the year, Bad Times at the El Royale.
Mystery abounds at a past-its-prime hotel that straddles the state line between California and Nevada.
From the trailers, I expected Bad Times at the El Royale to be darkly funny, but instead it's mostly just dark. Smart, twisty storytelling and an exceptional cast should be the envy of Hollywood, with Chris Hemsworth, Cynthia Erivo, and Jeff Bridges turning in exceptionally strong performances. El Royale has layers to spare, and just when you think you've got it figured out, another one peels off to reveal something unexpected. The film boasts superb production design and a strong score by Michael Giacchino. I can't go into much detail without spoiling important plot points, but there are some disturbing and uncomfortable moments that lend a grim tone to the whole, ultimately making it less fun than it might have been, but no less brilliant.
Bad Times at the El Royale runs 141 minutes and is rated R for "strong violence, language, some drug content, and brief nudity."
Bad Times at the El Royale is one of the best movies I've seen this year...but I probably wouldn't watch it again.
Of a possible nine Weasleys, Bad Times at the El Royale gets seven, which would have been eight but for a mean and unnecessary dig at my beautiful home state of West Virginia.
Fangirl points: You know it's officially awards season when Shea Whigham starts turning up in everything!
Until next time...