Search This Blog
Sunday, February 22, 2015
Cindy Prascik's Oscar Blog with Daniel's thoughts sprinkled in.....
Guys, guys, guyzzzzzzzzzzz...guess what?? I'm snowed in!! You know what that means? Instead of a third screening of Kingsman: The Secret Service (maybe paired with a sneaky peek at McFarlane, USA...admit it, you want to see it too), I'll be stuck at home and bored out of my skull! So, here, have another Oscar blog...because exactly what you needed right now is yet another person's opinion on other people's opinions.
I must admit up front that there are categories where I haven't had access to all of the films, but I can't let that stop me, because...snow day! And who believes Oscar voters actually watch all their screeners anyway? Also, let it be known that I've skipped categories where I haven't seen anything. (Lookin' at you, Short Form Documentary!)
Without further ado...
BEST PICTURE:
What will win: Birdman
What should win: The Imitation Game
What really should win: Calvary
It's no secret I'm appalled at how 2014's best movie was done wrong by awards season. Having said that, my motto for this category is "Anything but Boyhood!" I don't think The Theory of Everything or American Sniper legitimately belong on this list, either, but both are at least good pictures, whereas Boyhood is an unmitigated disaster. Also, for the last time this awards season: it's time to stop the genre snobbery. Guardians of the Galaxy and/or Captain America: The Winter Soldier should at least be nominated here.
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - Oscars love splitting up Best Picture and Director unless there's a clear winner, Birdman will win meaning director will go to Linklater's Boyhood.
BEST ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE:
Who will win: Eddie Redmayne
Who should win: Michael Keaton
Who really should win: Brendan Gleeson
Go on, Academy, sit there being wrong in your wrongness!
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - Think Michael Keaton is a shoe in.
BEST ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE:
Who will win: Julianne Moore
Who should win: Rosamund Pike
Who really should win: I'm actually okay with any of the ladies in this category. (Hold onto that, it might not happen again!)
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - Since I haven't seen Julianne Moore's film I really have no idea except to go with the flow and say Moore has it locked up.
BEST ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE:
Who will win: J.K. Simmons
Who should win: J.K. Simmons
Who really should win: Bradley Cooper
I'm sure it was never seriously considered, but Cooper's Rocket was smart, funny, brave, emotional, sincere...and a raccoon. Top that if you can!! I'm also a little bit afraid "Oscar winner" J.K. Simmons might be suddenly unavailable for that Law & Order reboot.
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - J.K. is a shoe in and frankly I couldn't be happier since I think he's great but I think Cindy is right, Law & Order The Next Generation is probably out.
BEST ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE:
Who will win: Patricia Arquette
Who should win: Emma Stone
Who really should win: Emma Stone
I'm good with my gal Emma on this one, though I do think Rene Russo (Nightcrawler) and Kelly Reilly (Calvary) should be among the nominees.
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - Arquette is winning because she's getting Boyhood love. I thought it was a great performance but not the best I've seen this year. Stone would be a great option.
BEST ANIMATED FEATURE FILM:
What will win: How to Train Your Dragon 2
What should win: Big Hero 6
What really should win: Big Hero 6
...but I'd be absolutely fine with The Boxtrolls, too. A travesty that The Lego Movie is not among the nominees.
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS -Sadly I saw none of the nominees which doesn't matter because The Lego Movie should been nominated and won.
CINEMATOGRAPHY:
What will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
What should win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
What really should win: John Wick
...and how is Nightcrawler not on this list??
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS -The Grand Budapest Hotel is wonderful but Birdman was kind of magical as well either is fine with me.
COSTUME DESIGN:
What will win: Into the Woods
What should win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
What really should win: The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies
From the magnificent detail of Thorin's armor to the snugglieness of Bilbo's bathrobe, nobody matches Middle Earth on this one.
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - I actually think The Grand Budapest Hotel has an excellent shot, well deserved too.
DIRECTING:
Who will win: Richard Linklater
Who should win: Wes Anderson
Who really should win: James Gunn
Listen, I'm not casting aspersions on anyone's talent, but if I randomly filmed some strange family for 12 years, I'd be in jail.
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - Linklater is getting this for his impressive experiment, it's hard to ignore what he pulled off and I've loved his "Before" films
FILM EDITING:
What will win: Boyhood
What should win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
What really should win: Captain America: The Winter Soldier
I could also be Team Nightcrawler here.
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - Birdman really impressed me on so many levels.
MAKEUP AND HAIRSTYLING:
What will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
What should win: Guardians of the Galaxy
What really should win: The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies
Middle Earth is unparalleled in the artistic categories.
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - More than happy if Budapest wins....
MUSIC (ORIGINAL SCORE):
What will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
What should win: Interstellar
What really should win: 300: Rise of an Empire
...and I'd also be good with Henry Jackman's Winter Soldier score here.
MUSIC (ORIGINAL SONG):
What will win: Glory
What should win: Everything is Awesome
What really should win: Everything is Awesome
The Academy just has to throw The Lego Movie a bone here.
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - In total agreement, everything is awesome should win just so we can say Oscar Winner Andy Samburg.
PRODUCTION DESIGN:
What will win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
What should win: The Grand Budapest Hotel
What really should win: John Wick
...again, how is Nightcrawler not on this list??
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - Another one for Budapest
SOUND EDITING:
What will win: Interstellar
What should win: The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies
What really should win: The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies
Obviously, I'm good with #OneLastOscar for Jackson's Middle Earth.
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS -Interstellar will win, I know because of the ringing in my ear....
SOUND MIXING:
What will win: Interstellar
What should win: American Sniper
What really should win: The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies
I thought it was great. So sue me.
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS -American Sniper should win, excellent sound mixing if you ask me but Birdman's beats are still in my head.
VISUAL EFFECTS:
What will win: Interstellar
What should win: X-Men: Days of Future Past
What really should win: X-Men: Days of Future Past
Time in a Bottle. That is all.
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - Guardians of the Galaxy deserves this to be honest, it's effects are just fantastic!
WRITING (ADAPTED SCREENPLAY):
What will win: The Theory of Everything
What should win: The Imitation Game
What really should win: Guardians of the Galaxy
In for a dime, in for a dollar, right?
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - Theory or Imitation would be great choices.
WRITING (ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY):
What will win: Birdman
What should win: Birdman
What really should win: Birdman/Grand Budapest Hotel
...but this is another "Anything but Boyhood!" category for me!
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - Keeping my Birdman love going
So, there you have it. Discussion is, of course, welcome.
Hope everyone enjoys the Oscars!
Until next time...
DANIEL'S THOUGHTS - I really need to see Calvary
Sunday, February 15, 2015
Cindy Prascik's Review of Kingsman: The Secret Service
Dearest Blog, yesterday it was off to the cinema for a picture totally worth braving the elements: Kingsman: The Secret Service.
Spoiler level here will be mild, nothing you wouldn't know from the trailers.
A young man headed down the wrong path is recruited as an international super-secret agent.
Dear reader(s), to say I was eagerly anticipating Kingsman: The Secret Service would be the grossest of understatements. In fact, I bought tickets, sight unseen, to watch it back to back, a feat previously achieved only by movies featuring a certain caped crusader. I am pleased to report the film does not disappoint.
Kingsman: The Secret Service is a comic-book movie for grownups. It's fun and funny and crass at times, but it's got a mature feel that has more to do with adult themes than with the film's f-word fueled R rating.
Kingsman features end-to-end action, including brilliantly-choreographed fight scenes, some terrific stunt driving, and even a bit of gymnastics, but it's never in a hurry just to jump from fight to fight, chase to chase; there's a STORY here.
The clever inclusion of just the right tunes in just the right places--tunes most of us likely never would have thought to put in said places--is the best I've seen outside an Edgar Wright picture. Colin Firth is a debonair gentleman spy; in fact, he makes it hard to imagine anyone else ever could have inhabited the film's leading role. Relative newcomer Taron Edgerton seems bound for superstardom if this turn as a smart, cocky ne'er-do-well turned secret agent is any indication.
The supporting cast is uniformly stellar, and, if I had one teensy complaint about this near-perfect movie, it's that I sure would have liked to see more Jack Davenport.
Kingsman: The Secret Service clocks in at 129 minutes and is rated R for "sequences of strong violence, language, and some sexual content."
As a wise friend predicted, of a possible nine Weasleys, Kingsman: The Secret Service gets all nine.
It's a smart, funny, self-aware spy thriller that proves pushing the envelope has legitimate value and doesn't have to be just to shock.
Until next time...
Sunday, February 8, 2015
MOVIE REVIEW: BIRDMAN
A fading actor (Michael Keaton) best known for his
portrayal of a popular superhero attempts to mount a comeback by appearing in a
Broadway play. As opening night approaches, his attempts to become more
altruistic, rebuild his career, and reconnect with friends and family prove
more difficult than expected. Lindsay Duncan.
Director: Alejandro González Iñárritu
Cast: Michael Keaton, Lindsay Duncan, Zach Galifianakis,
Edward Norton, Andrea Riseborough, Emma Stone
Release Date: Oct
17, 2014
Rated: R for brief Violence, Some Sexual Content and
Language Throughout
Runtime: 1 hr. 59 min.
Genres: Comedy, Drama
Review:
Birdman is a dizzying powerhouse of a film that’s showcases
it’s cast and director on multiple levels.
Alejandro González Iñárritu has crafted a fascinating dissection of fame
and celebrity culture through the guise of a mental breakdown. Michael Keaton’s soul baring performance is
simply amazing. It’s an unglamorous
performance which shows every inch of age on Keaton’s face while showcasing his
impressive talent. Aided by excellent
supporting turns by Edward Norton and Emma Stone, Birdman maintains an
impressive energy throughout as it builds to its crescendo. There’s nary a moment when the film drags and
it’s at it’s best when Norton and Keaton share the screen together since you
can tell they are both having a blast while putting on some impressive
performances. If there’s a small
drawback it’s the film does reek of self importance even smugness at some
points. That being said, Birdman is the
type of prestige film that should hold up well upon repeat viewing thanks to
some wonderfully crafted filmmaking and acting.
A
MOVIE REVIEW: BOYHOOD
Richard Linklater's Boyhood is a coming-of-age drama that the director spent twelve years making. He cast a young boy, Ellar Coltrane, and shot the film a few days at a time for over a decade so that he could capture how his leading actor, and the rest of his cast, aged. The film's story simply follows a boy named Mason (Coltrane) as he progresses from age 6 to 18 and deals with the typical travails of childhood like his parents' divorce, bad stepparents, falling in love, finding his artistic voice, and fighting with his bratty older sister. Ethan Hawke and Patricia Arquette co-star as Mason's parents. ~ Perry Seibert, Rovi
Director: Richard Linklater
Cast: Patricia Arquette, Ethan Hawke, Lorelei Linklater,
Steven Prince, Libby Villari
Release Date: Jul
11, 2014
Rated R for Sexual References, Language and Teen Drug and
Alcohol Use
Runtime: 2 hr. 42 min.
Genres: Drama
Review:
Richard Linklater’s audacious cinematic experiment is
truly unlike anything you’ve seen before in a movie. It’s a ground breaking experience that truly
takes us through a journey that all of can relate to. At its core it’s a fairly straightforward
film about the ups and downs of life but by letting us see the growth and aging
of the cast of as a whole, it creates a certain singular effect as you watch
the film. Ellar Coltrane is truly authentic
and effective as Mason from childhood up through the film’s finale. Occasionally there’s some chunkiness’ in his
delivery but overall it’s an impressive coup all things considered. Patricia Arquette really shines as his mother
as we follow her journey throughout the twelve years covered. She brings a high level of believability and honesty
to the role that’s hard to pull off. Ethan
Hawke is equally impressive while working with much less screen time. The characters transformation is impressive
and believable mainly due to Hawke’s impressive work. The story is anything but idyllic and while
some of the relationships presented do tend to follow a certain routine it never
feels inorganic or cheap. Linklater has
a certain ability to capture reality on celluloid much like he’s done before on
his Before series and he’s done it here with this masterpiece.
A
Cindy Prascik's Reviews of Jupiter Ascending & Paddington
Dearest Blog, with no Hobbit and nary a single decent-looking new release, there was really nothing to draw me to the cinema this weekend aside from the fact that I couldn't imagine sitting out two weekends in a row. Since I also lacked the wherewithal to sit through two stinkers in a row, I paired one of the weekend newbies with my sadly-neglected Paddington.
Spoiler level here will be mild, nothing you wouldn't know from the trailers.
First on my agenda, the comically horrible Jupiter Ascending.
Mila Kunis stars as a seemingly-normal Earthling whose life is endangered when she discovers she's universal royalty.
Dear reader(s), I shan't insult your intelligence by trying to tell you Jupiter Ascending isn't a mess; in fact, it is the cinema equivalent of your family room after the Super Bowl party, the Mall on Black Friday, Morgantown after a big game. I spent a good portion of the movie trying to determine whether the acting is literally the worst in history, or if the dialogue is just so poorly written there was nothing the actors could do with it.
Come next week he'll likely be an Oscar winner, but Eddie Redmayne is an embarrassment, a strangely-sweaty version of Gary Oldman's most over-the-top mid-90s baddie. I adore Sean Bean and Mila Kunis, but I hope they both fired their agents for getting them into this! Curious that a guylinered Channing Tatum, hardly the most respected name among the cast, was pretty much the only one who didn't make me cringe.
The story is a jumbled disaster that sometimes drags worse than the slowest David Cronenberg slog. A chase scene at the beginning is so long and repetitive that I fell asleep twice and woke up while it was still going. Having said all that, Jupiter Ascending is still oddly entertaining at times.
The sets and effects aren't anything special, but they are often very pretty, as are some of the costumes. There are plenty of funny moments--intentional and not--and (at risk of sounding girly) Kunis and Tatum make an adorable couple; it's not hard to root for them.
Jupiter Ascending clocks in at 127 minutes and is rated PG13 for "some violence, sequences of sci-fi action, some suggestive content, and partial nudity."
Bad as it is, I didn't hate it. How's that for backhanded praise? Of a possible nine Weasleys, Jupiter Ascending gets four and a half.
Next up was Paddington.
A young bear from "darkest Peru" comes to London looking for a home.
I admit, for a movie about which I'd been pretty excited, I've been shamefully neglectful of Paddington.
Its schedule never seemed to work with other movies I wanted to see, and, after a couple weeks, I'd sort of resigned myself to waiting for DVD. I am so glad I didn't! My first thought upon seeing a Paddington trailer was, "Please don't mess this up." When Colin Firth jumped ship (to be replaced by my beloved Ben Whishaw) and the US release was pushed from a perfect holiday date to mid-January No Man's Land, I couldn't help but expect the worst. I am pleased to report that, whatever the reasons for those bumps in the road, Paddington is a pretty perfect movie.
The story is sweet, but never sugarey. The cast is top-notch, and Whishaw couldn't be more perfect as the voice of our beloved bear. There are many great laughs, for kids and adults alike, with enough action to keep things moving along at a good clip.
Finally, the movie manages to bring home an important message without beating viewers over the head with it.
Paddington runs 95 minutes and is rated PG for "mild action and rude humor."
Paddington is perfect for folks of any age, a genuinely terrific afternoon at the movies.
Of a possible nine Weasleys, Paddington gets eight.
Until next time...
MOVIE REVIEW: JUPITER ASCENDING
Mila Kunis stars as Jupiter Jones, an everyday girl in the future whose life takes an unexpected turn when an ex-soldier (Channing Tatum) comes looking for her in hopes that she can live up to her destiny as the savior of the universe. Andy and Lana Wachowski once again dip their feet into sci-fi territory with this sprawling Warner Bros. epic. ~ Jeremy Wheeler, Rovi
Director: Andy Wachowski and Lana Wachowski
Cast: Channing Tatum, Mila Kunis, Sean Bean, Eddie
Redmayne, Douglas Booth.
Release Date: Feb
06, 2015
Rated PG-13 for some Violence, Sequences of Sci-fi
Action, Some Suggestive Content and Partial Nudity
Runtime: 2 hr. 5 min.
Genres: Action/Adventure, Sci-Fi/Fantasy
Review:
Hybrid Wolf space hunter with space rollerblades. If you can wrap your head around Channing
Tatum’s character alone then you might find something to like in the
Wachowski’s nearly incoherent and utterly ridiculous Jupiter Ascending. The story is absurdly outlandish even though
it feels incredibly familiar as well.
Thankfully the Wachowski’s bring this usual visual flair to the
proceedings making for some truly impressive action sequences that keep you
entertained once you’ve decided to turn your brain off completely. If you accept Eddie Redmayne, acting with
combustible collagen fueled lips, as a mad despot then you might find some
enjoyment in the silliness. Mila Kunis
is ok as the titular Jupiter but she looks just as confused as we are, as a
result she played her character like a gullible moron who’s only happy with her
space hunter wolf hybrid and his space rollerblades.
C
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)