Search This Blog

Saturday, March 2, 2013

MOVIE REVIEW: THE LAST EXORCISM PART 2




Tormented Nell Sweetzer (Ashley Bell) discovers her infernal nightmare is far from over while waging a desperate struggle against the forces of darkness. Shortly after the events of the first film, Nell is discovered deeply traumatized in rural Louisiana. Her recent past is a blur, but the one thing Nell knows is that her entire family has perished. Later, just as Nell tries to start a new life in New Orleans, the evil force that laid claim to her body returns with a hellish vengeance, and a diabolical agenda. ~ Jason Buchanan, Rovi

Director: Ed Gass-Donnelly

Cast: Ashley Bell, Spencer Treat Clark, Louis Herthum, Dave Jensen, Tarra Riggs, Muse Watson

Release Date: Mar 01, 2013

Rated R for horror violence, terror and brief language

Runtime: 1 hr. 29 min.

Genres: Horror, Suspense/Thriller

Review:

The Last Exorcism part 2 is a pretty terrible title for a movie especially an unneeded and mostly unwanted sequel. It’s not a terrible film by any stretch but at the same time it’s a very good one either. It’s in between living in the wasteland of mediocrity. Horror movie clichés abound throughout the majority of the runtime. Director Ed Gass-Donnelly, who’s wholly outside of his wheelhouse, relies on all these clichés and just runs with it. He does a decent job of taking advantage of the setting which gives the film the slightest spark but it’s mostly uninspired. Ashley Bell, who left a strong impression in the first film, returns in the lead with mixed results. Bell isn’t nearly strong enough on her own to carry the film. She has a tendency to oversell her character’s naivety had she played it more subtle it might have worked better. As a film it’s a forgettable if watch able experience.

C-


11 comments:

  1. It's ironic that "The Last Exorcism" had a part 2, because it was the LAST. The Horror genre is my least favorite. However, I do like Psycho, Jaws and Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1979), although those are not exactly horror films in the modern sense.

    -James

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm a horror fan but I know there's a lot of garbage out there too, a real shame because when it's done well it's great. Those are some great films all around James!

      Delete
  2. i didn't love the first one, but i did think ashley was strong in it. sad to hear it all kinda crumples even further in this one. looks as lame as you say.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She really tried the best she could but she's just not strong enough currently to carry an entire film.

      Delete
  3. Part 1 was ok but there was definitely no need for a sequel. Trailer and posters look horrible.
    I'm sure I'll watch it, but I don't exactly look forward to.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't expect too much Maynard because there isn't much there.

      Delete
    2. I have no idea why, but I actually enjoyed it more than the first one... O_o

      Delete
    3. Bell is worthwhile but I don't it let me down for some reason.

      Delete
  4. I never saw the first Last Exorcism so I doubt that I will see this one.

    It's a pity cause I quite like this type of horror!

    K :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. First one is actually pretty good K expect for a stupid ending!

      Delete
  5. I agree and it just dismissed the baby she had at the end of the first one.

    Will do, thanks for reading!

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...